You Need a Multi-Cloud Dashboard Because I Want To Sell You One
If I called you and told you that your gasoline budget
should be on the same dashboard as your movie ticket budget, you’d look at me
like I just laid an egg.
Why, then, do so many companies insist you need to view your
GCP, Azure, and AWS spend in the same dashboard?
Different cloud providers run different workloads for your
business (or at least they damn well should!) because multi-cloud for a given
workload is invariably the wrong move.
I go into this in some depth elsewhere. But today’s post is
less about the poor strategic decision itself than it is the idea of having a
dashboard to centralize all of your public cloud spend in the same context.
When you’re using multiple providers, the billing dimensions
are different, the confusion levels are similar, and there’s no direct
comparison that makes sense at a resource level. CPU and RAM options alone vary
to a point where it’s very hard to get 1:1 equivalence between instances (or
virtual machines) across providers, so you’re rounding. Invariably, you’re
rounding badly.
Your CFO doesn’t care what you’re spending on container
orchestration. They care how big the checks you’re writing to AWS and Azure
are, how much of those checks are for development versus production, and what
those numbers are going to look like 18 months from now.
The comparisons that can be exposed and shown via API aren’t
the things that are relevant to a business context—and business context is
something that cloud visibility dashboards are completely lacking.
To wit, everyone’s got a metric for 500 errors. But nobody’s
got a metric for how happy their users are.
It turns out there’s no API for business insight.
My perhaps overly cynical take is that the companies selling
these multi-cloud solutions have a vested interest in customers making
suboptimal cloud decisions.
If you go all in on a single cloud provider, the right
dashboard answer is either “the one they provide for your use” or “picking up
the phone and yelling at them until the dashboard they provide for your use
meets your needs.” It’s not cutting large checks (or worse, a percentage of
your cloud bill!) to third-party companies that are selling a solution for a
problem you almost certainly don’t have.
What’s worse is that as native dashboards continue to
improve, third-party vendors become actively incentivised to encourage and
promote multi-cloud strategies that actually
harm their customers.
I remain steadfast in my opinion that a big driver behind
multi-cloud discussions is a sea of vendors who depend on you making a poor
decision. Otherwise, they have nothing to sell you.
[Source]-https://www.lastweekinaws.com/blog/you-need-a-multi-cloud-dashboard-because-i-want-to-sell-you-one/
AWS Training for Beginners Courses in Mumbai. 30 hours practical training program on all
avenues of Amazon Web Services. Learn under AWS Expert
Comments
Post a Comment